August 7, 2010

This is is our crowning glory

Terence McKenna Reclaim your mind!

Catalysts to say what has never been said, to see what has never been seen. To draw, paint, sing, sculpt, dance and act what has never before been done. To push the envelope of creativity and language. And what's really important is, I call it, the felt presence of direct experience. Which is a fancy term which just simply means we have to stop consuming our culture. We have to create culture. Don't watch TV, don't read magazines, don't even listen to NPR. Create your own roadshow. The nexus of space and time, where you are now, is the most immediate sector of your universe. And if you're worrying about Michael Jackson or Bill Clinton or somebody else, you are disempowered. You are giving it all away to icons. Icons which are maintained by an electronic media, so that you want to dress like X or have lips like Y. This is shit-brained this kind of thinking. That is all cultural diversion. And what is real is you and your friends, your associations, your highs, your orgasms, your hopes, your plans, and your fears. And we are told no. We're unimportant, we're peripheral, get a degree, get a job, get a this, get a that, and then you're a player. You don't even want to play in that game. You want to reclaim your mind and get it out of the hands of the cultural engineers who want to turn you into a half-baked moron consuming all this trash that's being manufactured out of the bones of a dying world. Where is that at?

T.McKe 1999 – In the Valley of Novelty pt 8

@ 35 min) When I got these ideas in 1971, 1972 and wrote The Invisible Landscape and all that, I was too hot for public consumption. I was manic and grandiose and classicly processed schizophrenic.
I hope I wasn't as offensive as some of the cases that I've experienced myself, because I tried never to lose my sense of humor and my good taste, but I did tend to be didactical – time meant nothing to me! I mean I would corner people in rooms and seven hours would go by and I was unrolling diagrams ... It amazes me!
You have no idea how toned down and how ... my whole career is about not emptying it up too much, not raving too much, not ... always appearing or being selfmocking, ironical ... at home with the idea that I might be wrong. These are the manners the "schizophrenic" must learn in order to pass among the "normals" without one dropping a no. 3 steel net mesh over you and hitting you with a tranquilizing dart.
So, you know, that was 72, 82, 92 ... my god, I'm slowly coming down from those trips!

Als ich 1971, 72 diese Ideen hatte und "Die Unsichtbare Landschaft" und all das schrieb, war ich zu aufgedreht fürs allgemeine Verständnis. Ich war manisch und grandios und schizophren im klassischen Sinn.
Ich hoffe, ich war nicht so ungehörig wie einige Fälle, die ich selbst erlebt habe, denn ich versuchte, nie meinen Sinn für Humor und meinen guten Geschmack zu verlieren, doch ich neigte dazu sehr erzieherisch zu sein – Zeit bedeutete mir nichts! Ich meine, ich würde die Leute zusammentrommeln, und sieben Stunden würden vergehen, in denen ich ein Diagramm nach dem anderen erklärte ... Es macht mich fertig!
Ihr könnt euch nicht vorstellen, wie gedämpft, wie abgebremst und wie ... meine gesamte Karriere hängt davon ab, es nicht zu sehr auszureizen, nicht zu rabiat, zu radikal zu sein ... immer ironisch aufzutreten, voller Selbstironie ... unter der Vorgabe, dass ich ja falsch liegen könnte. Das sind die Manieren, die ein "Schizophrener" lernen muss, wenn er sich unter "Normalen" bewegen will, ohne dass jemand eine Nr. 3-Stahlnetzmatte über dich wirft und dich mit einem Beruhigungspfeil niederstreckt.
Das war 1972, 82, 92 ... mein Gott, langsam komme ich runter von diesem Trip!

T.McKe 1995: Let's just make it true enough.

@ 4 min) This is the point I wanted to make: there is between the ego and full understanding of reality a barrier, a problem: the fear of the ego to surrender to the fact of chaos. Chaos is what we have lost touch with. This is why it has been given a bad name, because it is feared by the dominant archetype of our world which is the ego, which clinches, because its existence is defined in terms of control. And the furious modelling process, that the ego endlessly carries out, is an effort to fight the absence of closure. The ego wants closure. It wants to complete explanation.
The beginning of wisdom, I believe, is the ability to accept an inherent messiness in your explanation of what's going on. Because nowhere is it writ, that human minds should be able to give full accounting of creation in all dimensions and on all levels. You know, Wittgenstein had this idea that philosophy should be, what he called "true enough", and I think that's a great idea. Let's just make it true enough because that's as true as it can be gotten.

Darauf wollte ich hinaus: zwischen dem Ego und einem vollen Verständnis der Realität gibt es ein Hindernis, ein Problem, und zwar die Angst des Egos, vor dem (Umstand des) Chaos zu kapitulieren. Das Chaos selbst ist es, zu dem wir den Kontakt verloren haben – deshalb ist es in Verruf geraten. Es wird gefürchtet vom dominierenden Archetyp unserer Zeit, dem Ego, welches klammert, weil sein Bestehen als Beherrschung definiert ist. Und der grimmige Modellierungsprozess, den das Ego endlos ausführt, geschieht aus dem Bestreben heraus, der Abwesenheit von Schlussendlichkeit zu trotzen. Das Ego will Absolutheit – es will Erklärung vervollständigen.
Weisheit beginnt dort, glaube ich, wo jemand die Fähigkeit aufbringt, eine inhärente Unordnung in seiner Deutung von dem, was vor sich geht, zu akzeptieren. Denn nirgendwo steht geschrieben, dass der menschliche Verstand in der Lage sein sollte, vollständig Rechenschaft abzugeben über sämtliche Dimensionen und alle Ebenen der Schöpfung. Wittgenstein hatte diese Idee, dass Philosophie, wie er sich ausdrückte, "hinreichend wahr" sein müsste, und ich denke, das ist eine starke Idee. Machen wir es hinreichend wahr, denn wahrer ist es sowieso nicht zu haben.

T.McKe – Seeking the Stone pt. 1

@ 14 min) The wonderful thing Timothy Leary said many years ago:
LSD is a drug which occasionally causes psychotic behaviour in people who have not taken it.
You see?! And I certainly saw this.
I mean, I saw my parents became violently psychotic from not taking LSD.

@ 27 min) As many of you know, I am a great fan and spokesman for Psilocybin, for the Mushrooms.
The Mushrooms that I am so stoked on, were discovered in 1953 by Gordon and Valentina Wasson. Discovered in 1953, made absolutely schedule one illegal in 1966.
13 years was the window in which western civilization had to study this compound and figure out what it was for, and they were just beginning to focus upon it, when it was made illegal!
LSD discovered in 1937, not brought into the scientific literature until 1948, not generally available I believe in the laboratories until 1950, made total illegal in 1966. 16 years window!

Think about the fact, that when LSD was legal, psychiatrists, professional researchers were consistently reporting cures of chronic alcoholism with one 500 gamma dose. One dose cure – like a 50% curing rate without recidivism for chronic alcoholism. Spectacular findings were being reported! When LSD swept through the scientific community, for pharmacologists, for psychotherapists, for psychiatrists, it had the same kind of excitement and feeling of breakthrough, that the splitting of the atom had for the physics community in the late 30s.

Well, science we are told, is this absolutely impartial godlike "body of knowledge", prosecuted by great men, and it will fearlessly send its questing mind into any situation or environment. This is a mental discipline so dispassionate, that it sees nothing at all wrong with strapping monkeys into apparatus and hurling them into walls with 70 miles an hour to study dramatic injuries.
This is a discipline so unflinching in its pursue of truth that it will design tiny television cameras to be implanted in plastic penises, so that we can see the changes in the colour of the vaginal wall as it approaches orgasm. These guys are unstinting in their devotion to truth in any form. And yet … and yet …
For 30 years, science has accepted government's refusal to allow science to look at the potential impact of psychedelic plants and compounds on human consciousness, on chronic alcoholism, on schizophrenia, on depression, on autism, on learning disorders, on dyslexias, on memory enhancements so forth and so on.
This to me is obscene!

The future is mental! Figure it out! If the mind does not loom large in the future history of this species then what the hell future is it going to be?! I mean this is our crowning glory!

@ 14 min)
Die wundervolle Formulierung, die Timothy Leary vor vielen Jahren verwendete: LSD ist ein Rauschmittel, das bisweilen irre Verhaltensweisen bei Leuten hervorruft, die es nicht genommen haben. Versteht ihr?! Und ich konnte das beobachten. Ich meine, ich sah meine Eltern heftig ausflippen vom Nicht-zu-sich-nehmen von LSD.

@ 27 min)
Wie viele von euch wissen, bin ich ein großer Fan und Fürsprecher von Psilocybin, von Pilzen. Die Pilze, für die ich mich so einsetze, wurden 1953 von Gordon und Valentina Wasson entdeckt. Entdeckt 1953, für absolut illegal erklärt 1966.
13 Jahre betrug das Zeitfenster, in der die westliche Kultur diese Substanzen studieren und herausfinden konnte, für was sie gut sind. Sie waren gerade dabei, erst richtig damit anzufangen, als es wieder verboten wurde!
LSD – entdeckt: 1937, in der wissenschaftlichen Literatur nicht besprochen bis 1948, in den Laboren nicht allgemein verfügbar bis, ich glaube, 1950, für absolut illegal erklärt: 1966. Ein 16-Jahre-Zeitfenster!

Bedenkt die Tatsache, dass, als LSD noch legal war, Psychiater, Wissenschaftler übereinstimmend davon berichteten, wie chronischer Alkoholismus mit einer einzigen 500mg-Dosis geheilt werden konnte. Eine Dosis reichte – mit einer Heilungsrate von 50% für chronischen Alkoholismus ohne Rückfälligkeit. Von spektakulären Ergebnissen war da die Rede!
Als LSD durch die wissenschaftliche Gemeinde fegte, löste es bei Pharmakologen, Psychotherapeuten, Psychiatern dieselbe Art von Aufgeregtheit und das Gefühl eines großen Durchbruchs aus wie damals in den 30er Jahren die Atomspaltung in den Physik-Fachbereichen.

Schön, Wissenschaft, wie uns erzählt wird, ist dieser absolut unerschrockene, gottähnliche, von großen Männern vorangetriebene "Leib an Wissen". Und dass sein fragender Geist furchtlos in jede Situation und jede Umgebung hineingeschickt wird. Dies ist eine geistige Disziplin so leidenschaftslos, dass sie überhaupt nichts falsches darin sieht, Affen in Apparate festzuschnallen und sie mit 70 Meilen pro Stunde gegen Wände zu schleudern, um dramatische Verletzungen zu studieren.
Das ist eine Disziplin, so entschlossen in ihrem Streben nach Wahrheit, dass sie winzige Fernsehkameras konstruiert und in Plastikpenisse einbaut, damit wir sehen können, wie sich die Farbe der Vaginalwand verändert, wenn der Orgasmus erreicht wird. Diese Jungs sind vorbehaltlos in ihrer Hingabe an die Wahrheit in jeglicher Form. Und doch ... und doch ...
Seit 30 Jahren hat die Wissenschaft die Zurückweisung seitens der Regierung akzeptiert, die potentielle Bedeutung psychedelischer Pflanzen und Präparate auf ihre Auswirkungen bezüglich chronischem Alkoholismus, Schizophrenie, Depression, Autismus, Lernstörungen, Rechtschreibschwächen, Verbesserungen der Gedächtnisleistung usw. usf. wissenschaftlich zu untersuchen.
Für mich ist das obszön!

Die Zukunft ist geistig! Seht es ein!
Wenn der menschliche Geist sich in der bevorstehenden Geschichte dieser Spezies nicht deutlich abzeichnet, wohin zum Teufel soll die Zukunft sonst führen?!
Ich meine, das ist unsere krönende Herrlichkeit!

November 11, 2009

America doesn't have a president

"It has been reported that trillions of collective dollars not shown in government budget reports are shown through government CAFR reports and they are virtually never openly discussed by the syndicated news media, both the Democratic and Republican Party members, the House, Senate, and organized public education, and as in such over the last 50 years the domestic and international investment assets of US Federal and Local Governments as a whole have taken over the Stock, Derivative, Insurance, and Debt Markets. The collective private sector's assets and investments as of 2000 are now insignificant in comparison with what US Government now owns by and through investment.. [...]
Ask the school district for a letter as to who funded the School District's last several bond issues (get the investor information). Then get a letter from the treasurer that the school district does not use their own investments funds to fund their own debt. Local governments through shell investment firms that they may start themselves or contract out with will use their own investment funds to fund their own debt and thus move money out of sight of the public to lock in a long-term investments for themselves and a debt under their 'Budgetary' expenses for the public to repay. No reply, or an illusive reply not answering that specific question is in any light an admission of their participation.
Put that can of worms out for the public to digest of their local governments over the last 20 to 30 years have transitioned into funding their own debt (bond issues) and see what happens. (The best result would be for much of the standing debt held is vacated against the standing investments held by the same local government entity.) The only justification I got from the local government financial managers was that 'look at what a good job we are doing investing the public's funds, we got them a .25% (quarter percent) lower then they could have got from the private sector.'
This practice of self-debt funding by local governments now exceeds several trillion dollars in composite totals. The cost of interest for that debt is shown on the 'Budget' report and the returns from the investment that funds the debt is shown in the note sections of the local government's corresponding CAFR 'Comprehensive Annual Financial Report'.
Note: It is some times better to go to the State run Enterprise Authority handling the financial investment and do a reverse look at what local governments are participating and for how much."

"The public maintained the illusion that government 'survived' off of tax income (with the help of the bought and paid for Media and Political talking heads monopoly), and as of 2000 only 1/3rd of the gross income when looking at the big picture was tax income.
Now, here is the key for comprehension: government's attitude was: anything we collect in tax income we are responsible to the public for oversight and disclosure given to the public. Anything we accomplish pertaining to our gross income that is non-tax income, we are only accountable to ourselves and we can invest, spend, and transfer that income as we choose without public oversight and disclosure given. Well, that amount has now blossomed into 2/3rds of the gross income. Publicly promoted budget reports given for public consumption are almost exclusively showing tax income. [...]
I was a CTA for 14 years and traded the derivatives market for 31 years. Additionally, I was national sales manager for the US Trading Championship, US Investing Championship, and Money Money Managers verified Ratings for a period of ten years (1982-1992). Per the Money Managers Verified Ratings, I was dealing with a few managers that had 150 to 750 billion dollars under management. When I learned of Governments true scope and size of their participation and ownership in the International Investment arena, in 1994 I called a few of the big boys I had dealt with and gave them a brief of 'the forest'.
They were unaware until told and their minds alerted to the comprehension to look (they were to busy dealing with a few trees in the forest). Additionally they were only given information that the forest controllers wanted them to see. Any comprehensional direction towards discussion, qualification, consolidated total reports, or validation of or what the forest had become was intentionally omitted in and from the learning curve.
Most managers were only dealing with a few leaves or branches and knew there were a few big trees around them, but that was as far as it went – due to the money control and ownership involved. [...]
Being that 'Government has already taken it all over by investment' the TRF comes in and reverts ownership back to direct benefit to the people through phasing out 'all taxation', the biggest organized crime inflicted on the population of this earth, and makes visible the hidden influence peddling for profit accomplished to start war, genocide, or stripping of taxpayer revenue into shill investments held to guarantee a massive profit for the inside players at taxpayer expense and loss, with this being the second biggest crime on earth.
They are using taxpayer funds to shore-up their own investments of which out of their own greed for profits through the use of expanded derivative vehicles, those arenas were destabilized in the first place. Now that's the definition or arrogance and blatantly a lack of open non-disclosure to the public. The new Amerika with a fascist twist, and the bought and paid for political and news media talking heads keep the masterfully orchestrated misdirection rolling along for business as usual to continue, due to the money, profit, and control involved. Stripped from the American people over the decades I may add."

"Here is the basis for what is going on here.

Cecil Rhodes, British statesman and empire builder, in his last will he says [...] in the first five wills Cecil Rhodes repeatedly called for a 'secret society, the true aim and object whereof should be the extension of the British rule throughout the world and eventually the ultimate recovery of the United States of America'. So there is a secret society operating around the world that has as its true aim and objective the destruction of the freedom of our country. And these people are British royalty. Not the English people! The English people are a beautiful people, have a very beautiful history, the country and even the U.K., all three of the countries are beautiful countries with beautiful people. But the British royalty, in my humble opinion, are the most evil operation on the face of the earth. I believe they're behind the drug trafficking, mafia, blood loaning ...

Now, the main thing that I wanted to talk about today [...] I want you to understand something very clearly. When anyone asks you in this country: Are you a citizen of the United States? [...] What do you think that they're asking you? Is it: Are you lawfully in this country? Are you lawfully here to do business and be here? That's not what they ask you.
The country is called America. America is the name of the country.
But in the late 1860s, a group of men got together and incorporated a privately owned company. Anyone can incorporate a privately owned company, and a group of men did. They incorporated a company privately owned, and they called the company 'The United States Company Corporation'. And according to corporate law – and anyone who has a corporation in business knows according to the corporate law – all corporations must have a president. That's the law. And it must have a vice president. And it must have a secretary of treasury. That's corporate law. So the corporation had to have a president and a vice president.
Today when you see, once a year, at the State of the Union, when you see the president comes out and the Speaker of the House says: 'Ladies and Gentlemen, the President of the United States', everybody in this country thinks this is the President of America. America doesn't have a president. This is a corporate term used in business. The United States Corporation is a privately owned company. It's privately owned!
And it's a ten miles square that it operates in called 'The District of Columbia'. 'Columbia' simply means universal. This is what 'Catholic' means: universal. When you start tracing back the ownership of the corporation called 'United States' privately owned company, then you began to see that, if you say that you are a citizen of the U.S., what you're saying lawfully is that you are an employee of a foreign corporation on the International Maritime Admiralty Law.
You are an employee of a privately owned company.

Therefore, if you are living in any state such as California and you're making money here, then what you are doing quite literally is moonlighting, because you are already working for an employee of a privately owned company called United States Corporation. But you're earning money in California. Therefore you are a franchisee of a foreign corporation under maritime law. You're a franchisee! It's like opening up a McDonalds here.
You can open up a McDonalds but you're not the boss of McDonalds. The McDonalds Corporation is the boss. They tell you what you can sell and what you can't sell, and how much it is gonna be, and they call the shots. You can really be a franchisee operating under their jurisdiction. So consequently each one of us who call ourselves a citizen of the U.S. is in point of fact a franchisee of a foreign corporation. And once a year you have to pay what is referred to as California Franchise Tax Board because you're a franchisee of a foreign corporation on the international law.

Let me explain something to you.
There are two kinds of law on the earth, basically two kinds of law: Roman Civil Law and Maritime Admiralty. Roman Civil Law comes from the word civil or civili, in Latin meaning [...] Civil Law is referred to as the law of the land. But there is a higher law that governs the whole earth. (That's the one where I think the reptilians are into.) There is a higher law that operates on the earth, and it has nothing to do with the civil law of any country. Because civil law is different in any country. You can do things in Africa, you can't do in Spain. Or you can do things here in America, you can't do in France. Because the people's law, the law of the land, is different according to the culture. But when you talk about the Maritime Admiralty Law ... what we're talking about is the law of water, the law of banks. Banking law is called Maritime Admiralty.
And consequently ... This is why incidently the Statue of Liberty could not be put on land in this country. It had to be put in a port. It had to be put in water. Why?
Because it's not the Statue of Freedom, – It's a statue of liberty! Liberty is what a sailor gets when you pour in the port, because the admiral gives the captain on those boats, those ships ownership of your body. You ask permission to leave. And if he lets you what he is most slightly not going to, but if he allows you to leave, you have liberty. You don't have freedom! And as long as you call yourself a U.S. citizen, you are an employee of a foreign corporation incorporated under international maritime law, and consequently you're a franchisee of a foreign corporation. They. Own. You.

Now, let me show you how they own you. When a ship pours into port say from Japan and brings an estate 800 million dollars worth of Toyotas and televisions, the first thing the captain has to do is, fill out and give to the port authorities something called a certificate of manifest. He has to give them a certificate showing how much each car causes whether has four doors or two, if it got air conditioning, if not. Every car has to have a certificate of manifest showing exactly what you're bringing into this country, how much it is gonna cost our banks, how much we're gonna have to pay for this, and so is business – It comes in on water. It's Maritime Admiralty Banking Law. So therefore, each item has to have a certificate of manifest. And the ship when it pours into, it parks at the dock, and where it parks is called 'the ship sits in its birth.' Now, when you were born, your mother ... her water broke, and when your mother's water broke, you came out, and therefore you're a maritime admiralty product on the international maritime banking law. You are a product! Because you came out of your mothers water, and therefore you have to have a birth certificate. And the birth certificate has to be signed by the doc. Okay? And consequently, if you go to Sears and you buy something that's to large to take home, they'll bring it to you. And so they will tell you what time they're going to deliver the product. That's why your mother was in a delivery room. She was delivering a product on the international law.

Now, when you get the birth certificate, that is a Maritime Admiralty certificate that shows you are a 'human re-source'. And the corporation called United States went to your mother and asked her: Would you donate this body to us as a colateral for a loan?
Because each birth certificate is worth when it first started in 1933 ... I am told it was like $ 630,000 per birth certificate on the international exchange.
And your birth certificate today is on the stock market.
Look on the back of your social security card, and you will see numbers in RED. Any time you see red numbers, they represent your blood. You turn it on the other side, and you'll see it in BLUE. Blue is Maritime Admiralty, the Navy Blue.
So consequently you are a product that was bought. And on the birth certificate, there on the bottom right where your mother signed, it doesn't say mother or parent, it says 'informant'. [...]
My mother had an uncle when I was growing up. My mother had an uncle who worked in the Vatican's Secretary of States Office. I'm Italian. My mother also had two federal judges as uncles when I was growing up living in my home town. So I know the Catholic church, I know the Jesuits, I understand the Mafia, I understand the Cosa Nostra. I mean, when I saw Godfather that felt at home. This was the way I visioned life. So I know what I'm talking about. I have spent 42 years reading and studying and researching theology – that's my subject. Government is not my subject. [...]

The Pope of Rome made a proclamation in the late Middle Ages. He said that the Pope is the Vicar of Christ. You may have heard that term, 'Vicar of Christ'. The word vicar in Latin simply means 'one who stands in for'. [...] which means, he is standing in for Jesus.
Consequently the idea is that god created the whole heavens and the whole earth and he owns everything on it. And so therefore, he turned it over to his son, Jesus, his son. But since Jesus isn't here, somebody has to run this place. So since Jesus isn't here, the pope said I will be the Vicar of Christ. I'll stand in for him till he gets back. Then when he gets back, I'll turn over the whole world to Christ, but until he gets here, I'm in charge! Okay? As long as you understand that, we're going to do just fine.

Now, the first thing the pope did after declaring himself the Vicar of Christ, made himself the owner of all life on the earth, for Jesus. Jesus owned the whole earth but he ain't here, so I do. Second: He made a contract with the King of England. It was a commercial treaty of sorts with the King of England in which he gave the possessions of Jesus, which he held as the Vicar of Christ, to the King of England, as a corporate holding company. So, the whole world would be under the King of England FOR the Pope. So the Pope owns it, but the President of the Corporation is the King of England, and that whole corporation menagerie is called 'The Crown'. So when you hear about the British Crown, you have to understand that there is a world of difference between being Engl-ish and Brit-ish. British comes from an Hebrew word, berith. A 'berith' is a contract in the old Hebrew language, and 'ish' is a man or men. Therefore berith-ish becomes british – man of the contract. That's why any time you do anything of any importance in this country or in the western world you got to sign a contract. When you get married you get to have a Marriage Licence. The same reason why attorneys have to have a licence."

Cojo) The self-appointed majestic position of being "god's vicar" in person, quasi as the only legal embassador of an allmighty, unknown, fatherly souled creator of landscapes and lifes, entitles or raises in my eyes the claim to absolutistic world dominance quite automatically!
Declaring then himself "infallible" seems merely the next consequent move on the project of entering the throne of a "King of the World" someday, and finally inaugurating the long built-up Catholic "World Pharaoh" of Rome resp. Jerusalem, who represents with one universal religion the "all-seeing" power of a global monarchical constitution under the no longer smoked, implants-based Jesuit Shepherd's Fold.

"Mr. Speaker, in order that the American people may have a clearer understanding of those who over a period of years have been undermining this Republic, in order to return it to the British Empire, I have inserted in the record a number of articles to prove this point. [...] Andrew Carnegie, in his book entitled Triumphant Democracy. In this he expresses himself in this manner: 'Let men say what they will, I say that as surely as the sun in the heavens once shone upon Britain and America united, so surely is it one morning to rise, to shine upon, to greet again the reunited states – the British-American Union.'
This statement is clear, and the organizations which Mr. Carnegie endowed have spent millions in order to bring this about. [...] organized to bring about a British union, a union in which the United States would again become a part of the British Empire. However, this has been upset to some extent by the attempt of the internationalists to establish their own government as an International or world union."

"A human being is not a person because he is a human being, but because rights and duties have been ascribed to him. Specifically the person is that legal subject or substance of which the rights and duties are attributes. But not all human beings are persons, as was the case in Old England when there were slaves."

Cojo) Slaves? Rome?
Sheeps? Shepherds?
There is no conspiracy.
Of course not.
That's absurd. Totally.
Absolutely groundless!
Exceedingly after that totally non-absurd Towers-to-Ash global television event with it's daily bombardment of "9/11"-like terror monger by now two main memestreams of opinion, the old corporate and the new conspiratorial one.

Serious crimes which aren't cleared-up stay reproducible with the greatest of ease. Logically.

Are you a sovereign yet?

November 3, 2009

Secret societies operate through intelligence agencies

02/28'07 Vyzygoth interviews Darryl Eberhart on Beyond The Grassy Knoll

Darryl) And then just the last couple of years, I all of the sudden decided to discover that there was a real superpower behind the scenes, orchestrating things in the religious world, in the financial world, in the geopolitical world, and of course, that's what I have recently termed the "Vatican-Papacy-Jesuits-Knights of Malta cabal". And I believe they are the real real powers behind most of the powerful governments in the world, clearly with the Roman Catholic religion over a billion adherents and with super financial stockholdings etc. through their fabulously rich Knights of Malta. So by far, they are the biggest people out there. […]
Keith V-Goth) What I find people having a hard time with is the fact that this could be so perversive. And they still have a hard time believing it because of the PR that comes out of the Vatican etc. [...]
The government, you know, they are not our friends. At the behest of the listener, I put up on my homepage links to three New York Times stories that tell you, the FBI was involved, you could say, and also pulled off the 1993 World Trade Tower Bombings, okay? There is three stories out there, straight from the New York Times, and they implicate themselves, they convict themselves. […] This is only the beginning of it, it's not all the FBI's fault. But the fact is, we have a problem: Our government is not our advocate, it's our adversary. […]

Darryl) The way to control governments is to bribe people, to give them money, to give them power and sexual favors. And I think, a lot of Congressmen in the past and probably to this very day, the new ones they come in, they get them in compromising position.
Basically, secret societies operate through intelligence agencies. I think, we hung up on this idea of 'oh, all the CIA couldn't be bad, or all the FBI couldn't be bad, or all the national security agencies couldn't be bad – no one can pull of a conspiracy without a whole lot of people knowing.' Well, can I give him a little bit of my background? And I'll tell him why they can do that.
Keith) Absolutely.
Darryl) I spent 26 years in the intelligence community. I had a Top Secret Special Intelligence Clearance that entire time. I was at the top of my profession as a technician – eleven and a half of that was in the old U.S. Air Force Security Service. I learned Russian and Arabic languages. I was a linguist, a traffic analyst, and a reporter in the Air Force. And then I spent eight and a half years in what would be the army's equivalent to that: the old army security agency – military intelligence. And then I worked six years for the National Security Agency, after I retired from the military. And the reason that they're able to pull so many things off is, that within those intelligence communities, where you have people with top secret clearances, everything is on a need-to-know basis, and it's very compartmentalized, so that you could be in one room and the room down the hall you can't get in despite all your Top Secret Special Intelligence Clearances, because it's on a strict need-to-know basis. But the key thing is that most of the people in the CIA, the FBI, the NSA are good, red-blooded, patriotic Americans who are working hard to do their job, especially during the Cold War that they were fighting against Communism and America's enemies. And they are at the bottom, they have no idea – just like a secret society: they are at the bottom, they are popping information up, and the people at the top feed off that information, correlate it, provide it to whom they will, keep what information from whom they don't want it to get to, and that's the way they are able to control things. The Kennedy Assassination is a beautiful picture of that because you have Knights of Malta all over the intelligence community.
The FBI Assistant Director Cartha DeLoach for the FBI was the liaison to the Warren Commission. Then the CIA liaison to the Warren Commission was another Roman Catholic military order Knight of Malta James Jesus Angleton. So any information going back and forth between the Warren Commission, which is an interesting commission, had some of Kennedy's enemies on it like Allen Dulles () also a lot of top-level Freemasons were at the heads of these organizations. So again, you don't have to have all of your people in these organizations, all you have to do is have them at key choke points, key leadership positions, like Angleton was the head of the CIA's counter-intelligence – probably just as powerful as the head of the CIA – for like decades. He also set the Vatican desk, he set the Israel desk, but the key thing was: he was the liaison to the Warren Commission. So that any information going back and forth between them were handled by a couple of Roman Catholic military order Knights of Malta and, of course, you had Roman Catholic Knights of Malta involved in other areas [...] they're all over the map in the intelligence community.

Keith) Would it be fair to say that, when you do have sort of black bag operatives in the intelligence communities, that they are necessarily there because of their membership in a secret society?
Darryl) I think, if they get into any of a top position, they are either in the secret society or they're being controlled by the secret societies, whether it's through, like I said, sexual gifts, whether they give them monetary gifts ... If somebody that's either in, with them, or totally controlled by them, you're not going to be in a powerful position – I don't think – and last very long. John Kennedy is the perfect example. If you start to bug the system, they're going to either try to buy you off, give you something special, or bribe you if they know of sexual indiscretions etc., and if none of that works very quickly ... if you very powerful, very high up, that you might reveal secrets or break up like Kennedy was going to do break up the CIA into a thousand pieces, especially take the black ops from them and transfer it over to the Pentagon, then they're going to kill you. And most likely they will kill you. [...] I think, John Kennedy, and Bobby, and a few others were really trying to run stuff out of the White House, and when they started to go against some of their advisers, when he started to print money outside of the Federal Reserve, when he decided to shut down he war in Vietnam, there were just to many powerful interests in the background that decided, 'hey, he is double-crossed, thus he has got to go.'
Keith) Do you wonder if the old man hadn't taken a very debilitating stroke at the end of '61, if he would allowed those to – perhaps what I would say – 'go rogue'?
Darryl) That who had that debilitating stroke?
Keith) Joseph Kennedy
Darryl) Oh! I heard from some folks that when they said, 'your boy's got to go,' that he just nodded his head. There has been several books written about his ties with Sam Giancana and others. Joseph Kennedy – he was the mob.
Keith) Of course the fiction work which I don't think it's fiction, obviously, and the name excapes me – I think it's also the individual who wrote The Manchurian Candidate () which heavily, heavily innervates that the father knew, it was the price of doing business.
Darryl) Exactly.

Another example of good patriotic Americans, you have like Navy Seals or Special Forces that are sometimes ... especially Special Forces – I don't know if you ever had Lt. Colonel Daniel Marvin on?
Keith) No.
Darryl) He was asked to kill Lt. Commander William Bruce Pitzer [...] and he was trying to get that information out to the public, thus he had a Top Secret Clearance as Navy Lieutenant Commander, and so Marvin, Colonel ... he was then a Captain of Special Forces was asked to take him out at the Bethesda Naval Hospital. He refused because he said, you know, 'Special Forces are only used to assassinate people overseas, and you guys use the CIA here, in the U.S. I'm not gonna do it.' Well, they asked another captain and I think, he might have been the one Special Forces' Captain that killed him. But the point I'm trying to get here is that they were saying that Pitzer, Lieutenant Commander William Bruce Pitzer at the Bethesda Naval Hospital, was gonna tell secrets to the Soviets, so, you know, 'you need to kill this guy!' And that's how they get good patriotic people like Special Forces () to assassinate one who's actually a guy trying to bring important information to the American people or to reveal evil that's going on within government. And they ask a guy that's been highly-trained in assassination technics () sniper etc., 'hey, you need to kill this guy because he's selling secrets.' So, you can see, how it works. They can get a good patriotic American to kill another good patriotic American by lying to him. And that's very sad, but that's going on.

Keith) Whenever people talk about ... You know, I'm not saying people. I mean, when Wilcox, yourself, Phelps, Tom Richards, when we have discussed, or/and they had written about the Vatican and the Jesuits, everybody says, 'oh wow, they can't be into everything.' But they certainly are, I mean, their diguise is a one that nobody thinks they are capable of it, because there are supposedly ecclesiastically into, that they could have such an expansive and efficient organization. But I also want to mention one other thing: (And we had a gentleman on here () by name of Greg, who has a website that kind is devoted to occult history:, and Greg if you're listening, you can be insulted by this as well.) I'm gonna to have another guest on, who are really starting to bother me with his tone. And if he's listening today, he probably won't come on, because I'm directing it to him. And that is, he writes me an email saying he will come on the show – he said, 'but my own views are very different from those who focus on the Illuminati, Freemasons and such distractions and trivia.' Well, I would love to send him back a very measured email. Because this is the kind of "locked head" that is out there, that makes so many of these things happen. This also includes people not believing that the Vatican, the Jesuits, and – as you said before – the Knights of Malta can be involved in this stuff. But now, having set that all up, there is a hierarchy! And when you mention this along with the temporal coadjutors, you're looking at a framework, so that when you mention this, it involves all this but it makes others think perhaps that we've gone loony. Your take.

Darryl) Yeah, the reason for that is, and it's very sad, and to some American I can say this: We Americans, for the most part, are extremely "history-challenged". Not only do we know very little about real church history, not only do we know very little about european history, world history, but we know very little about true American history. I ran into Europeans, Keith, when I was over in Germany and other places, that knew far more about American history than a lot of Americans do. And I talked to you earlier about this: we need to be doing more reading. You mentioned about the Jesuits – most people they can't just believe that the Jesuits are that powerful. Let me just give you a couple of quotes here. You know, a lot of people try to blame it on the Jews, to blame it on Freemasons, and it's just like I said, the last couple of years, every stone I started turning over, I started finding Jesuits, Knights of Malta, which is controlled and co-located with the Jesuit Order, involved in almost any key assassination of heads of state, important ones and throughout history, involved in fomenting wars like WW I and WW II. So here is that great quote. It's by a Canadian historian, J.E.C. Shepherd, and if the Jesuits aren't so powerful and so bad, then why would a quote like this be made.

Between 1555 and 1931, the Society of Jesus was expelled from at least 83 countries, city states and cities, for engaging in political intrigue and subversive plots against the welfare of the State, according to the records of a Jesuit priest of repute [i.e., Thomas J. Campbell]. [...] Practically every instance of expulsion was for political intrigue, political infiltration, political subversion, and inciting to political insurrection.

So, and most of the people that threw them out, Keith, were Roman Catholic monarches! They were thrown out of places like Spain and Portugal, like two and three times each, France, they were thrown out most of the Central American countries, they were thrown out of Russia several times. Of course, almost any time that that occurred, they came back with a vengeance. They were responsible for assassinating not only President Abraham Lincoln, which is something that's totally disappeared from American history text books and from encyclopedias, but they killed Czar Alexander I and Czar Alexander II of Russia, they killed King Henry III and King Henry IV of France – one of them tried to give religious liberty to all of the French people. They've got such a track record of murder, not to mention religious genocide like happened in Croatia in the 1940s.

There is another great quote – () some people, you know, try to say, the Masons are running everything – this is by another historian, it's an American historian named James Parton. Very short quote, he says:

If you trace up Masonry, through all its Orders, till you come to the grand tip-top head Mason of the World, you will discover that the dread individual and the Chief of the Society of Jesus [i.e., the Superior General of the Jesuit Order] are one and the same person.

So clearly, these guys are big power players. If we go back and study european history, we'll find out for centuries ... and of course the Jesuits are kind of – as far as the Roman Catholic Church goes – a relatively new order: they have only been around 400 and plus years. But for those 400 years, almost every single King, Queen, the mistresses of the King, the top generals in those countries – all had Jesuits for their father confessors. Their children ... of any royalty, or anybody that was important went to Jesuit colleges. In universities they were at the forefront of setting all those up. So, when you become the father confessor to the King, or the Queen, or to his mistresses, and all of the sudden you want the King to launch – let's say – a religious genocide against the Waldenses or somebody, you just go in and say, 'hey King, we want you to kill all these people, even in your own country,' and if he starts to hesitate, 'well, how about we tell the Queen about your ten mistresses?' That's why I wrote an article about the confessional. It's the greatest intelligence gathering system that the world has ever seen.

October 27, 2009


Nevertheless, our cultural crisis is deepening. Deepening mainly because we have very poor connections between our fragmented and autonomous psychic structures - within ourselves as individuals and within ourselves as a society. Our whole problem is that we can't communicate with each other, we can't express intention. And the psychedelics are sitting there waiting to unify us, to introduce us to the trans-linguistic intention. To carry us forward into a realm of appropriate cultural activity, which is to my mind the realm beyond history. Beyond history lies effortless and appropriate cultural activity. And nature has proceeded us, as it always does, by laying out models that can be followed to realize this.
As an example and by request, I'll point out that the 19th century had a titular animal. Its titular animal was the horse, idealized as the steam engine, the Iron Horse. Marx talked about the locomotive of history, and there was this whole focusing on the horse archetype, which in the 20th century gave way to the titulary animal, the raptor, the bird of prey, as exemplified by high-performance fighter aircraft, as the kind of ultimate union of man and machine in some kind of glorification of the completion of a certain set of cultural ideals. You see?
Well, in thinking about this and in thinking about how language is the cultural frontier of our species, I went to nature looking for models of how we might move beyond the bird of prey, which when you think about it, it is the American symbol. It was also the symbol of the Third Reich. A lot of creepy scenes have actually been into birds of prey ... when Alaric the Visigoth burned Eleusis, it was the crow that fluttered on his battle standard as the greasy smoke swept by. So these dark birds have been with us.
Anyway, in looking for a new titulary animal and drawing the conclusion of what it would mean, I was drawn to look – strangely enough – at cephalopods, octopi. Because I felt, first of all, they are extremely alien. The break between our line of development in the phylogenetic tree and the mollusca, which is what a cephalopod is, is about 700 million years ago. Nevertheless, and many of you who are students of evolution know, that when evolutionists talk about parallel evolution, they always drag out the example of the optical system of the octopi. Because: Isn't this astonishing? It's very much like the human eye, and yet it developed entirely independently, and this shows how the same set of external factors impinging on a raw gene pool will inevitably sculpt the same organs or attain the same end, and so forth and so on.

Well, the optical capacity of octopi is one thing, what interested me was their linguistic organization. They are virtually entirely nervous system. First of all, they have eight arms in the case of the octopods, and ten arms in the case of the squid, the decapods. So coordinating all these organs of manipulation has given them a very evolved, capable nervous system as well as a highly evolved ocular system. But what is really interesting about them is that they communicate with each other by changing the color and texture of their skin and their physical shape. You may have known that octopi could change colors, but you may have thought it was camouflage or something very passive like that. It isn't that at all. They have a vast repertoire of traveling bars, dots, blushes, merging pastels, herringbone patterns, tweeds, mottled this-and-thats, can blush from apricot through teal into dove gray and on to olive ... do all of these things communicating to each other. That is what their large optical system is for. It is to be able to see each other. The other thing which octopi can do – besides having these chromatophores on the surface of their skin – they can change the texture of the skin surface: can make it rugose, papillaed, smooth, lobed, rubbery, runneled, so forth and so on. And then, of course, being shell-less molluscs, they can hide arms and display certain parts of themselves and carry on a dance.
When you analyze what is going on here, what at first seems like merely fascinating facts from natural history, begins to take on a more profound aspect. Because it is an ontological transformation of language that is going on in front of you. Note that by being able to communicate visually, they have no need of a conventionalized culturally reinforced dictionary. Rather, they experience pure intent of each other without ambiguity because each octopus can see what is meant – this is very important – can see what is meant.
And I think that this heralds, or could be made to herald, a transformation in our own definitions of language and communication: what we need is to see what we mean. It's not without consequence or implication, that when we try to communicate the notion of clarity of speech, we always shift into visual metaphors: I see what you mean, he painted a picture, his description was very colorful. It means that when we intend to indicate a lack of ambiguity and communication, we shift to visual analogies. This can in fact be actualized. And in fact, this is what is happening in the psychedelic experience. There we discover, just under the surface of human biological organization, the next level in the organization of language: It's the ability to generate some kind of acoustical hologram that is manipulated by linguistic intent.

Now don't ask me how this happens, because nobody knows how it happens. At this point it's magic. Nevertheless, the fact is it does happen - you can have this experience. It represents a synesthesia in the presence of ongoing communication. It is, in fact, telepathy. It is not what we thought telepathy would be, which I suppose if you're like me, you imagine telepathy would be hearing what other people think. It isn't that. It's seeing what other people mean. And them also seeing what they mean. So that once something has been communicated, both parties can walk around it and look at it the way you study a Brancusi or a Giacometti in an art gallery.
By eliminating the ambiguity of the audio signal and substituting the concreteness of the visual image, the membrane of separation, that allows the fiction of our individuality, can be temporarily overcome. You see? And the temporary overcoming of the illusion of individuality is a much richer notion of ego-death than the kind of white-light, null-states that it has imagined to be. Because the overcoming of the illusion of individuality has political consequences. The political consequences are that one can love one's neighbor, you see, because the commonalty of being is felt. Not reasoned toward, or propagandized into, or behaviorally reinforced, but felt.
This is why there is this persistent notion, which accompanies these psychedelic compounds, of a new political order based on love. This was a hard thing to say in the panhandle in 1965, it's not easy to say in heavy-metal L.A. in 1987. But it seems to be the fact of the matter that love, which poets have celebrated for eons as inaffable, may in fact have certain inaffable dimensions attached to it, but it may in fact be more affable than we had previously cared to imagine. And it's the invoking of the affability of love that has to do with discovering the shared birthright, the atemporal dimension that is co-present with this reality, a dimension that is a vast reservoir of anchoring – existential anchoring – for each and all of us in our lives.
So my response to feeling the political pull of this, feeling the power to transform language, that resided in these things, was to go to the people who I thought would know most about it: the shamans for whom hallucinogenic shamanism has never been an issue, for whom the notion that you're supposed to do it on the natch is a patent absurdity. I mean, if you're serious about doing it on the natch I suggest you eliminate all food. Because this notion of the pristine self somehow riding above the muck of the world, carrying on a spiritual evolution is absolute foolishness. We are made of the stuff of the world.
People, who do not confront the presence of the hallucinogenic possibility, are turning their back on their birthright. In the same way that if you do not experience sex throughout your life you are turning your back on your birthright. After all we could argue that to allow another person to touch you, is to not do it on the natch, right? But, dear friends, we're slicing too close to the bone here to take that approach. It's much better, I think, to open to the world. The world is communication. Nature is the great teacher. All human gurus are simply distillations of the wave of nature that is coming at you. So you can just short-circuit the whole human boil-down, and go straight to the executive suite by putting yourself under a tree in the wilderness. The Great Ones all have said this but they need to be taken more seriously on the subject of their own expendability. Me too.

Going to the Amazon with these kinds of notions and looking at what had been achieved there, I came to have a vision then of the future that could be. That we are sort of hurling ourselves into a new Stone Age where the fruits of the prodigal wandering, that I discussed in such detail last night, can be used to infuse new meaning into that paradise. The imagination of man and woman is so incomparably rich and exerts such an attraction on us as the builder-monkey that we have to honor that. We cannot demonize that and preach a kind of naturalism that if actually put in place would cause the starvation of tens of millions of people. We have passed the point where some kind of Luddite reform can save us. It's only, I think, very self-indulgent elites that can preach voluntary simplicity, because a lot of people are experiencing involuntary simplicity. And, unless you're one of them it rings rather hollow to be told that Zen values are best.
Re-inserting ourselves into nature is inspiration for cultural design – that's what it is, it's not flight from the design process but a re-invigoration of it.
Some of you may be aware of the concept of nanotechnology in which everything is built at the molecular level. By studying the mechanisms of the cell and the immune system and DNA, we begin to have a picture of how molecules and atoms are the machine parts of a microcosmic world, that if we were elf chemists, we could make our way into and create anything that we could imagine. I mean, I can foresee a world where all machines will be made by DNA-like polymers that will code base materials into larger and larger aggregates.

The minaturization of our world is a great frontier. As culture becomes more enveloping, its physical manifestation should become less material. You see? So the ultimate notion is of the world turned back to the form it held – let's say – 35,000 years ago, in which people lived in an environment of entirely climaxed natural perfection. However, behind their eyelids lies a culturally and consensually validated data phase space that is culture, civilization. Turn each of us into a telepathic aquarium that has a direct pipeline to the general ocean of mind and being. This is possible. In fact, its not only possible, it may be the only decent solution: to download ourselves into another dimension. (And I want to note in passing the collapse of Max Headroom. What a tragedy I think that is that his last show was tonight. This was a weird force for cultural transformation, but to be applauded. If anybody here tonight has anything to do with it, I wish them luck.) But this sort of notion ... the Max Headroom people and the William Gibson people have a very high-tech take on this, because they are interested in accentuating this tight blue-jean, cyber-punk kind of notion. But in fact the worlds that they describe will have many many different social sub-groups and social eco-systems forming in them. What the future really means is choice to become who we are, to flower out, to find our own way.
McLuhan saw all this 20 years ago: He said that the rise of global electronic feudalism would create an atomistic fragmentation of culture. It may well be that within 50 years the largest organizational entity on the planet will be corporations with a few million loyal employees, and all larger social institutions will have disappeared because they were unable to command loyalty in a social environment where direct experience has become empowered. And this empowering of direct experience, this return to the feminine, this legitimizing of the presence of the vaster regions of the unconscious – these are all aspects of this emerging paradigm of the spirit. "Understanding and Imagination in the Light of Nature", which is what this two-night party has been called, is a definition of the spirit. Understanding and imagination in the light of nature – in other words, true understanding, poetic imagination, standing as a mirror before nature as object, will cause the hologrammatic presence of the spirit to magically appear. It will be then seen to be a kind of emergent quality of the situation that was previously masked, simply because the elements had not fallen into the correct arrangement. And as we move forward through time over the next 25 years there will be many prophets of the transcendental object at the end of time, many takes.
The important thing is to recall Godel's Incompleteness Theorem and to always recognize the provisional nature of the metaphysical goods that you're going to be sold. Nobody has the faintest notion of what's going on. It's important to keep that in mind. If you have that in mind, then the game proceeds much more cleanly. What is ahead of us is true high adventure.